Xeon D-2752TER vs W-2140B
Aggregate performance score
Xeon D-2752TER outperforms Xeon W-2140B by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 758 | 681 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 25.02 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Power efficiency | 8.58 | 14.73 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 21 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 24 February 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,061 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 11 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 2066 | FCBGA2579 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 77 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | 1 TB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2140B and Xeon D-2752TER.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 32 |
| USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 24 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 10.81 | 11.91 |
| Recency | 21 December 2017 | 24 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 77 Watt |
Xeon D-2752TER has a 10.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 55.8% lower power consumption.
The Xeon D-2752TER is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2140B in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
