EPYC 9654 vs Xeon W-1350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads
12.29

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-1350 by a whopping 543% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking5644
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.0710.12
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$690 $4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 148% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB Intel® Smart Cache384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P750no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200 @60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-1350 12.29
EPYC 9654 78.98
+543%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-1350 by 543% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-1350 19015
EPYC 9654 122155
+542%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-1350 by 542% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-1350 2154
+18.2%
EPYC 9654 1823

Xeon W-1350 outperforms EPYC 9654 by 18% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-1350 8202
EPYC 9654 18430
+125%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-1350 by 125% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.29 78.98
Recency 1 April 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 20 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 982 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1350 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.