i9-13900KS vs Xeon W-1350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-1350
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 80 Watt
11.97
Core i9-13900KS
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
38.73
+224%

Core i9-13900KS outperforms Xeon W-1350 by a whopping 224% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking65073
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation93.7355.86
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency14.0924.31
Architecture codenameRocket Lake-S (2021)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)12 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$255$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1350 has 68% better value for money than i9-13900KS.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size276 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics P750Intel UHD Graphics 770
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units3232
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200 @60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-1350 11.97
i9-13900KS 38.73
+224%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-1350 19007
i9-13900KS 61517
+224%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-1350 2153
i9-13900KS 3138
+45.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-1350 8167
i9-13900KS 21712
+166%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.97 38.73
Integrated graphics card 4.56 6.16
Recency 6 May 2021 12 January 2023
Physical cores 6 24
Threads 12 32
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon W-1350 has 87.5% lower power consumption.

i9-13900KS, on the other hand, has a 223.6% higher aggregate performance score, 35.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 300% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Core i9-13900KS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-1350 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900KS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1350 and Core i9-13900KS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350
Intel Core i9-13900KS
Core i9-13900KS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 837 votes

Rate Core i9-13900KS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1350 or Core i9-13900KS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.