EPYC 7313P vs Xeon W-1290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-1290
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 80 Watt
12.98
EPYC 7313P
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
27.18
+109%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-1290 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking549159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.3619.89
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Milan (2021)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$913
Current price$345 $1252 (1.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1290 has 133% better value for money than EPYC 7313P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2032
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die size206 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200SP3
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size128 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-1290 12.98
EPYC 7313P 27.18
+109%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-1290 20071
EPYC 7313P 42032
+109%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 109% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-1290 1742
+28.3%
EPYC 7313P 1358

Xeon W-1290 outperforms EPYC 7313P by 28% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-1290 8810
EPYC 7313P 9404
+6.7%

EPYC 7313P outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.98 27.18
Recency 13 May 2020 15 March 2021
Physical cores 10 16
Threads 20 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7313P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1290 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1290 and EPYC 7313P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1290
Xeon W-1290
AMD EPYC 7313P
EPYC 7313P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate Xeon W-1290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7313P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1290 or EPYC 7313P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.