Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs Xeon W-11865MLE
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen AI Max+ 392 outperforms Xeon W-11865MLE by a whopping 187% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1008 | 248 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 11.08 | no data |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 15.34 | 19.98 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Strix Halo (2025−2026) |
| Release date | 26 August 2021 (4 years ago) | 6 January 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $467 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 64 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 190 mm2 | 2x 70.6 mm2 |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1787 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | LPDDR5X |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | AMD Radeon 8060S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-11865MLE and Ryzen AI Max+ 392.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.09 | 26.05 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.14 | 43.38 |
| Recency | 26 August 2021 | 6 January 2026 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 12 |
| Threads | 16 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Xeon W-11865MLE has 120% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max+ 392, on the other hand, has a 186.6% higher aggregate performance score, 947.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-11865MLE in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-11865MLE is a mobile workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
