Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Xeon Silver 4215R

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Silver 4215R
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
9.70
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads
40.72
+320%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Xeon Silver 4215R by a whopping 320% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking72255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.2516.94
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$794no data
Current price$1032 (1.3x MSRP)$2400

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX has 65% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4215R.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache11 MB128 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data74 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA3647sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB2 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4215R 9.70
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 40.72
+320%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Xeon Silver 4215R by 320% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4215R 15004
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62990
+320%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Xeon Silver 4215R by 320% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon Silver 4215R 1156
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 1646
+42.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Xeon Silver 4215R by 42% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon Silver 4215R 6617
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 14529
+120%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Xeon Silver 4215R by 120% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.70 40.72
Recency 24 February 2020 14 July 2020
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4215R in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4215R is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4215R and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4215R
Xeon Silver 4215R
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 17 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4215R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4215R or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.