Celeron N3350 vs Xeon Silver 4215

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4215
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
9.09
+1199%
Celeron N3350
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.70

Xeon Silver 4215 outperforms Celeron N3350 by a whopping 1199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8382707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.53no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Celeron
Power efficiency10.1211.04
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)30 August 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$794$24

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplier2511
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache11 MB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1296
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Smart Connectno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
HD Audiono data+
RSTno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Bootno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TB8 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data650 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes486
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4215 9.09
+1199%
Celeron N3350 0.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4215 14439
+1204%
Celeron N3350 1107

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4215 1030
+309%
Celeron N3350 252

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4215 6610
+1481%
Celeron N3350 418

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.09 0.70
Recency 2 April 2019 30 August 2016
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon Silver 4215 has a 1198.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

Celeron N3350, on the other hand, has 1316.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4215 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N3350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4215 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron N3350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4215 and Celeron N3350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4215
Xeon Silver 4215
Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4215 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 956 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4215 or Celeron N3350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.