EPYC 7272 vs Xeon Silver 4214Y

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4214Y
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
10.35
EPYC 7272
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 120 Watt
15.84
+53%

EPYC 7272 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214Y by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking746422
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.6311.62
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency11.5212.49
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$768$625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4214Y has 43% better value for money than EPYC 7272.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier2229
L1 cache768 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache12 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4214Y 10.35
EPYC 7272 15.84
+53%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4214Y 16442
EPYC 7272 25161
+53%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 15.84
Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 120 Watt

Xeon Silver 4214Y has 41.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7272, on the other hand, has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7272 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214Y and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4214Y
Xeon Silver 4214Y
AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4214Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4214Y or EPYC 7272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.