Xeon E5-2685 v3 vs Silver 4214R

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4214R
2020
12 cores / 24 threads, 100 Watt
11.86
+41.7%

Silver 4214R outperforms E5-2685 v3 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking613853
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.886.02
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Haswell-EP (2014)
Release date24 February 2020 (4 years ago)8 September 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$705no data
Current price$403 (0.6x MSRP)$314

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4214R has 463% better value for money than Xeon E5-2685 v3.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2412
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C85 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.65V–1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011-3
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size1 TB768 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4214R 11.86
+41.7%
Xeon E5-2685 v3 8.37

Silver 4214R outperforms E5-2685 v3 by 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4214R 18342
+41.7%
Xeon E5-2685 v3 12944

Silver 4214R outperforms E5-2685 v3 by 42% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.86 8.37
Recency 24 February 2020 8 September 2014
Threads 24 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4214R is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2685 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214R and Xeon E5-2685 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4214R
Xeon Silver 4214R
Intel Xeon E5-2685 v3
Xeon E5-2685 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4214R on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2685 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4214R or Xeon E5-2685 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.