Xeon W-3365 vs Silver 4209T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4209T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
7.16
Xeon W-3365
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
38.17
+433%

W-3365 outperforms Silver 4209T by a whopping 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking92674
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.31no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)29 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data
Current price$273 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads1664
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature91 °C77 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4209T 7.16
Xeon W-3365 38.17
+433%

W-3365 outperforms Silver 4209T by 433% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4209T 11080
Xeon W-3365 59038
+433%

W-3365 outperforms Silver 4209T by 433% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.16 38.17
Recency 2 April 2019 29 July 2021
Physical cores 8 32
Threads 16 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 270 Watt

The Xeon W-3365 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4209T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4209T and Xeon W-3365, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Xeon Silver 4209T
Intel Xeon W-3365
Xeon W-3365

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4209T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3365 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4209T or Xeon W-3365, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.