EPYC 7662 vs Xeon Silver 4116

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4116
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.27
EPYC 7662
2020
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
45.51
+391%

EPYC 7662 outperforms Xeon Silver 4116 by a whopping 391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking82143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.52no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency10.3219.14
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)19 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads24128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier2120
L1 cache64K (per core)4 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)256 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647Socket SP3
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4116 9.27
EPYC 7662 45.51
+391%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4116 14723
EPYC 7662 72298
+391%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.27 45.51
Recency 11 July 2017 19 February 2020
Physical cores 12 64
Threads 24 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 225 Watt

Xeon Silver 4116 has 164.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7662, on the other hand, has a 390.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7662 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4116 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4116 and EPYC 7662, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4116
Xeon Silver 4116
AMD EPYC 7662
EPYC 7662

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4116 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 7662 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4116 or EPYC 7662, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.