EPYC 7251 vs Xeon Silver 4112

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4112
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 85 Watt
4.17

EPYC 7251 outperforms Xeon Silver 4112 by a whopping 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1318743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.316.77
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date11 July 2017 (6 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$473$574
Current price$424 (0.9x MSRP)$348 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7251 has 105% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4112.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache256 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8.25 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size768 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s153.652 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4112 4.17
EPYC 7251 9.66
+132%

EPYC 7251 outperforms Xeon Silver 4112 by 132% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4112 6446
EPYC 7251 14935
+132%

EPYC 7251 outperforms Xeon Silver 4112 by 132% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.17 9.66
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Cost $473 $574
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 120 Watt

The EPYC 7251 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4112 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4112 and EPYC 7251, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4112
Xeon Silver 4112
AMD EPYC 7251
EPYC 7251

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4112 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 121 vote

Rate EPYC 7251 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4112 or EPYC 7251, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.