Apple M1 vs Xeon Silver 4110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.67
+24.4%

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Apple M1 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10431190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverApple Apple M-Series
Power efficiency7.16no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)no data
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.064 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KB2 MB
L2 cache8 MB16 MB
L3 cache11 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)85 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 8-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.67
+24.4%
Apple M1 5.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4110 10215
+24.5%
Apple M1 8207

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.67 5.36
Recency 11 July 2017 10 November 2020
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm

Xeon Silver 4110 has a 24.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Apple M1, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Silver 4110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4110 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Apple M1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Apple M1
M1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 18 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2212 votes

Rate Apple M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Apple M1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.