Xeon W-3345 vs Silver 4109T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4109T
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.69
Xeon W-3345
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 250 Watt
29.54
+342%

W-3345 outperforms Silver 4109T by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking970136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.18no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date11 July 2017 (6 years ago)29 July 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data
Current price$334 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4109T 6.69
Xeon W-3345 29.54
+342%

W-3345 outperforms Silver 4109T by 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4109T 10348
Xeon W-3345 45694
+342%

W-3345 outperforms Silver 4109T by 342% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.69 29.54
Recency 11 July 2017 29 July 2021
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 250 Watt

The Xeon W-3345 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4109T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4109T and Xeon W-3345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4109T
Xeon Silver 4109T
Intel Xeon W-3345
Xeon W-3345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4109T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Xeon W-3345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4109T or Xeon W-3345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.