FX-9370 vs Xeon Silver 4109T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4109T
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.64
+66%
FX-9370
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
4.00

Xeon Silver 4109T outperforms FX-9370 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10431434
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.31no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency8.811.69
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.7 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB8192 KB
L3 cache11 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C57 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt220 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4109T 6.64
+66%
FX-9370 4.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4109T 10348
+65.9%
FX-9370 6236

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.64 4.00
Recency 11 July 2017 6 July 2013
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 220 Watt

Xeon Silver 4109T has a 66% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more threads, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 214.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4109T is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9370 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4109T is a server/workstation processor while FX-9370 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4109T and FX-9370, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4109T
Xeon Silver 4109T
AMD FX-9370
FX-9370

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4109T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 159 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4109T or FX-9370, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.