Apple M3 Max 14-Core vs Xeon Platinum 8358

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8358
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 250 Watt
34.38
+48.8%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
2023
14 cores / 14 threads, 78 Watt
23.11

Xeon Platinum 8358 outperforms Apple M3 Max 14-Core by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking111224
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiency12.9627.92
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)no data
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads6414
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache48 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189no data
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size6 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M3 Max 30-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8358 34.38
+48.8%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 23.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8358 54416
+48.8%
Apple M3 Max 14-Core 36566

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.38 23.11
Recency 6 April 2021 30 October 2023
Physical cores 32 14
Threads 64 14
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 78 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8358 has a 48.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 128.6% more physical cores and 357.1% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 14-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 220.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8358 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 14-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8358 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 14-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8358 and Apple M3 Max 14-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8358
Xeon Platinum 8358
Apple M3 Max 14-Core
M3 Max 14-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8358 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 58 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 14-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8358 or Apple M3 Max 14-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.