Xeon W-2191B vs Platinum 8280

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8280
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
20.64
+17.1%
Xeon W-2191B
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
17.62

Xeon Platinum 8280 outperforms Xeon W-2191B by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking264349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.66no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency9.5311.91
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)21 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$10,009no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads5636
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2723
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)24.75 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data484 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA36472066
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1 TB512 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s85.33 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8280 20.64
+17.1%
Xeon W-2191B 17.62

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8280 32781
+17.1%
Xeon W-2191B 27984

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.64 17.62
Recency 11 December 2018 21 December 2017
Physical cores 28 18
Threads 56 36
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 140 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8280 has a 17.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 55.6% more physical cores and 55.6% more threads.

Xeon W-2191B, on the other hand, has 46.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2191B in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8280 and Xeon W-2191B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8280
Xeon Platinum 8280
Intel Xeon W-2191B
Xeon W-2191B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 124 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 13 votes

Rate Xeon W-2191B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8280 or Xeon W-2191B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.