EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8270

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8270
2018
26 cores / 52 threads, 205 Watt
19.45
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
59.33
+205%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon Platinum 8270 by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30121
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.80no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018)Milan-X (2022)
Release date11 December 2018 (5 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,405no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores26 (Hexacosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads52128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8270 19.45
EPYC 7773X 59.33
+205%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8270 29986
EPYC 7773X 91491
+205%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.45 59.33
Recency 11 December 2018 22 March 2022
Physical cores 26 64
Threads 52 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8270 has 36.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7773X, on the other hand, has a 205% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 146.2% more physical cores and 146.2% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8270 and EPYC 7773X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8270
Xeon Platinum 8270
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8270 or EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.