Ultra 5 125H vs Xeon Platinum 8260M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8260M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
22.20
+52.5%
Core Ultra 5 125H
2023
14 cores / 18 threads, 28 Watt
14.56

Xeon Platinum 8260M outperforms Core Ultra 5 125H by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking248518
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.91no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Meteor Lake-H
Power efficiency12.2747.42
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2018−2019)Meteor Lake-H (2023)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,705$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads4818
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.5 GHz
Multiplier24no data
L1 cache1.5 MB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 4 nm
Maximum core temperature90 °C110 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2049
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost++
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TB96 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® Arc™ graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data2.2 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes4828
PCI supportno data5.0 and 4.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 22.20
+52.5%
Ultra 5 125H 14.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8260M 33970
+52.5%
Ultra 5 125H 22278

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.20 14.56
Recency 2 April 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 24 14
Threads 48 18
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 28 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8260M has a 52.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 71.4% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

Ultra 5 125H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 489.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8260M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 125H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8260M is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 125H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8260M and Core Ultra 5 125H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M
Xeon Platinum 8260M
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
Core Ultra 5 125H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 332 votes

Rate Core Ultra 5 125H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8260M or Core Ultra 5 125H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.