Core Ultra 7 164U vs Xeon Platinum 8256

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8256
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
10.85
+11.1%

Xeon Platinum 8256 outperforms Ultra 7 164U by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking699764
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.95no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumIntel Meteor Lake-U
Architecture codenameCascade Lake-SP (2019)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,007no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads814
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.8 GHz
Multiplier38no data
L1 cache256 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB (shared)12 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °C110 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
Socket3647Intel BGA 2551
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TiBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanes488

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8256 10.85
+11.1%
Ultra 7 164U 9.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8256 16787
+11.1%
Ultra 7 164U 15106

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.85 9.77
Recency 2 April 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 8 14
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 9 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8256 has a 11.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Ultra 7 164U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 75% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1066.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Platinum 8256 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 7 164U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8256 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 164U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8256 and Core Ultra 7 164U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8256
Xeon Platinum 8256
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Core Ultra 7 164U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Xeon Platinum 8256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 164U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8256 or Core Ultra 7 164U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.