EPYC 7352 vs Xeon Platinum 8180

General info

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	176	164
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	12.50	23.90
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon Platinum	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2019)	Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date	11 July 2017 (6 years ago)	7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$10,009	$1,350
Current price	$1849 (0.2x MSRP)	$819 (0.6x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7352 has 91% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8180.

Technical specs

Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	28 (Octacosa-Core)	24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads	56	48
Base clock speed	2.5 GHz	2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	3.3 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	96K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	38.5 MB (shared)	128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Die size	no data	192 mm2
Maximum core temperature	84 °C	no data
Number of transistors	8,000 million	4,800 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	+
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	8 (Multiprocessor)	2 (Multiprocessor)
Socket	FCLGA3647	TR4
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Status	Discontinued	no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size	768 GB	4 TiB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	128.001 GB/s	204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	48	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8180 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

---

Advantages and disadvantages

---

Performance score	24.74	25.93
Recency	11 July 2017	7 August 2019
Physical cores	28	24
Threads	56	48
Cost	$10009	$1350
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	155 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8180 and EPYC 7352, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---