EPYC 7352: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC 7352
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 155 Watt
25.24

EPYC 7352 provides good benchmark performance at 25.24% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

AMD started EPYC 7352 sales 7 August 2019 at a recommended price of $1,350. This is a Zen 2 architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at professional systems. It has 24 cores and 48 threads, and is based on 7 nm, 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 3300 MHz and an unlocked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket TR4 processor with a TDP of 155 Watt. It supports DDR4 Eight-channel memory.

Primary details

EPYC 7352 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking195
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation10.74
Market segmentServer
SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency15.41of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,350of 17,906 (Xeon Platinum 8280L)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.4 GHzof 4.7 GHz (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed3.3 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
Multiplier23of 42 (Core i7-7700K)
L1 cache96K (per core)of 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache512K (per core)of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
L3 cache128 MB (shared)of 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography7 nm, 14 nmof 3 nm (Core Ultra 9 285K)
Die size192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility+
Unlocked multiplier+

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 7352 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H)
SocketTR4
Power consumption (TDP)155 Wattof 3100 ‑ 4500 (Ryzen 7 7435H)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by EPYC 7352. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+
AVX+
Precision Boost 2+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by EPYC 7352's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size4 TiBof 6 TiB (EPYC 9654)
Maximum memory bandwidth204.763 GB/sof 460.8 GB/s (EPYC 9654)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of EPYC 7352. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7352 25.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

EPYC 7352 40096

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

EPYC 7352's performance relative to its closest rivals among server CPUs.


Xeon W-3275 102.1
EPYC 7352 100
Xeon W-3275M 99.13
Xeon W-3335 98.02

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

All comparisons with EPYC 7352

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


4.7 3 votes

Rate EPYC 7352 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about EPYC 7352, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.