EPYC 7413 vs Xeon Platinum 8176

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8176
2017
28 cores / 56 threads, 165 Watt
14.99
EPYC 7413
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
32.47
+117%

EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8176 by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking437112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation25.7221.69
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan (2021)
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,719$1,825
Current price$349 (0x MSRP)$1485 (0.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8176 has 19% better value for money than EPYC 7413.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads5648
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.65 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
L1 cache1.75 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8176 14.99
EPYC 7413 32.47
+117%

EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8176 by 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8176 23179
EPYC 7413 50223
+117%

EPYC 7413 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8176 by 117% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.99 32.47
Recency 25 April 2017 15 March 2021
Physical cores 28 24
Threads 56 48
Cost $8719 $1825
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 180 Watt

The EPYC 7413 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8176 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8176 and EPYC 7413, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
Xeon Platinum 8176
AMD EPYC 7413
EPYC 7413

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 15 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8176 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate EPYC 7413 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8176 or EPYC 7413, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.