Opteron 6276 vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
17.29
+320%

Xeon Platinum 8175M outperforms Opteron 6276 by a whopping 320% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3751390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.22
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Interlagos (2011−2012)
Release dateno data14 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.5 MB768 KB
L2 cache24 MB16 MB
L3 cache33 MB8 MB (per die)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data316 mm2
Number of transistorsno data2,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)4
SocketSocket PG34
Power consumption (TDP)no data115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Wattno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 17.29
+320%
Opteron 6276 4.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
+320%
Opteron 6276 6348

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.29 4.12
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm

Xeon Platinum 8175M has a 319.7% higher aggregate performance score, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8175M is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6276 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and Opteron 6276, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 51 vote

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or Opteron 6276, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.