Xeon E5-2660 v3 vs Platinum 8173M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
17.64
+114%
Xeon E5-2660 v3
2014
10 cores / 20 threads, 105 Watt
8.26

Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms Xeon E5-2660 v3 by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking347909
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data7.44
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads5620
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data356 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PFCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)no data105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133
Maximum memory size1,536 GB768 GB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s68 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4840

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 17.64
+114%
Xeon E5-2660 v3 8.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025
+114%
Xeon E5-2660 v3 13120

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.64 8.26
Physical cores 28 10
Threads 56 20
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm

Xeon Platinum 8173M has a 113.6% higher aggregate performance score, 180% more physical cores and 180% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Platinum 8173M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2660 v3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Xeon E5-2660 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v3
Xeon E5-2660 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 1688 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2660 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or Xeon E5-2660 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.