Microsoft SQ1 vs Xeon Platinum 8173M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
20.58
+470%

Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2461429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.77no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumQualcomm Snapdragon
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release dateno data2 October 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$1999 $1873

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads568
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache1.75 MBno data
L2 cache28 MBno data
L3 cache38.5 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketSocket Pno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataQualcomm Adreno 685

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 20.58
+470%
Microsoft SQ1 3.61

Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by 470% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8173M 31837
+470%
Microsoft SQ1 5581

Xeon Platinum 8173M outperforms Microsoft SQ1 by 470% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.58 3.61
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The Xeon Platinum 8173M is our recommended choice as it beats the Microsoft SQ1 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8173M is a server/workstation processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8173M and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
Microsoft SQ1
SQ1

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 50 votes

Rate Microsoft SQ1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8173M or Microsoft SQ1, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.