Core i9-13900F vs Xeon Platinum 8160M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8160M
2017
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
34.37
+3.4%

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Core i9-13900F by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking97105
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation100.0082.22
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Raptor Lake-S
Release date25 April 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,704no data
Current price$397 (0.1x MSRP)$435

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8160M has 22% better value for money than i9-13900F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache1.5 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1.5 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8160M 34.37
+3.4%
i9-13900F 33.24

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Core i9-13900F by 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8160M 53158
+3.4%
i9-13900F 51420

Xeon Platinum 8160M outperforms Core i9-13900F by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.37 33.24
Recency 25 April 2017 4 January 2023
Threads 48 32
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F.

Be aware that Xeon Platinum 8160M is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8160M and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8160M
Xeon Platinum 8160M
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8160M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 98 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8160M or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.