i9-13900F vs Xeon Silver 4110

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.44
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.04
+398%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon Silver 4110 by a whopping 398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1060128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.8057.11
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency7.1746.66
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 885% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4110.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Efficient-coresno data16
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache11 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size768 GB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.44
i9-13900F 32.04
+398%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4110 10226
i9-13900F 50893
+398%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4110 803
i9-13900F 2790
+247%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4110 4585
i9-13900F 17389
+279%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.44 32.04
Recency 11 July 2017 4 January 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900F has a 397.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4110 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4110 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 159 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.