EPYC 7373X vs Xeon Phi 7290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameKnights Landing (2016)Milan-X (2022)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores72 (Doheptaconta-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads28832
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.05 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache32 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistors8,000 million33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 22 March 2022
Physical cores 72 16
Threads 288 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 240 Watt

Xeon Phi 7290 has 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

EPYC 7373X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 2.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7290 and EPYC 7373X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7290
Xeon Phi 7290
AMD EPYC 7373X
EPYC 7373X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 41 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 27 votes

Rate EPYC 7373X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7290 or EPYC 7373X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.