EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon Phi 7230

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated46
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data14.82
Architecture codenameKnights Landing (2016)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date20 June 2016 (8 years ago)18 September 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads256128
Base clock speed1.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cache32 KB (per core)96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistors8,000 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
Socket3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channelsno data8
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 June 2016 18 September 2019
Threads 256 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 280 Watt

Xeon Phi 7230 has 100% more threads, and 30.2% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7H12, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 7230 and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Phi 7230
Xeon Phi 7230
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Phi 7230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Phi 7230 or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.