Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Xeon Phi 3110X
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 550 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 84.56 |
| Architecture codename | Knights Corner (2012−2014) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 12 November 2012 (11 years ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 61 (Henihexaconta-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 244 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.05 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | 32 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 350 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 5,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PCIe x16 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 760M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 November 2012 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 61 | 6 |
| Threads | 244 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 15 Watt |
Xeon Phi 3110X has 916.7% more physical cores and 1933.3% more threads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 450% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon Phi 3110X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Phi 3110X and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
