Xeon Gold 5320T vs MP 7030 Dual-Core
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | Paxville (2002−2005) | Ice Lake-SP (2021) |
Release date | December 2005 (18 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 40 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2.83 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 16 KB | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 30 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 86 °C |
Number of transistors | 200 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Socket | 604 | FCLGA4189 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | no data | 6 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T.
PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 64 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 20 |
Threads | 2 | 40 |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 150 Watt |
Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core has 11.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 5320T, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 7030 Dual-Core and Xeon Gold 5320T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.