Apple M2 Pro 10-Core vs Xeon MP 3.50

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated686
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
DesignerIntelApple
Architecture codenameCranford (2005)no data
Release dateMarch 2005 (20 years ago)17 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 3.50 and M2 Pro 10-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads110
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache16 KB7.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB36 MB
L3 cache0 KB24 MB
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 3.50 and M2 Pro 10-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket604no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Watt36 MB + 24 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and M2 Pro 10-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 10
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 135 Watt 36 Watt

Apple M2 Pro 10-Core has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro 10-Core. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon MP 3.50 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro 10-Core is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 3.50
Xeon MP 3.50
Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
M2 Pro 10-Core

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 3.50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 132 votes

Rate M2 Pro 10-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon MP 3.50 and M2 Pro 10-Core, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.