Xeon MP 3.50 vs Apple M2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1038not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesApple Apple M-Seriesno data
Power efficiency17.99no data
DesignerAppleIntel
Architecture codenameno dataCranford (2005)
Release date10 June 2022 (3 years ago)March 2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M2 and Xeon MP 3.50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed2.424 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.48 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache2 MB16 KB
L2 cache20 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography5 nm90 nm
Number of transistors20000 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M2 and Xeon MP 3.50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data604
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M2 and Xeon MP 3.50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M2 10-Core GPU ( - 1398 MHz)no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 5 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 135 Watt

Apple M2 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1700% more advanced lithography process, and 575% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Apple M2 and Intel Xeon MP 3.50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Apple M2 is a notebook processor while Xeon MP 3.50 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M2
M2
Intel Xeon MP 3.50
Xeon MP 3.50

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 768 votes

Rate M2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 3.50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors M2 and Xeon MP 3.50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.