Apple M2 Pro vs Xeon MP 3.50

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated527
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple Apple M-Series
Architecture codenameCranford (2005)no data
Release dateMarch 2005 (19 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data2.424 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
L1 cache16 KB3.3 MB
L2 cache1 MB36 MB
L3 cache0 KB24 MB
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Number of transistorsno data40000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket604no data
Power consumption (TDP)135 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 12
Threads 1 12
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm

Apple M2 Pro has 1100% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon MP 3.50 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M2 Pro is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.50 and Apple M2 Pro, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon MP 3.50
Xeon MP 3.50
Apple M2 Pro
M2 Pro

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon MP 3.50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 165 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon MP 3.50 or Apple M2 Pro, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.