Apple M1 Max vs Xeon MP 3.16
Primary details
Comparing Xeon MP 3.16 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 524 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Apple M-Series |
| Architecture codename | Potomac (2005) | no data |
| Release date | March 2005 (19 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon MP 3.16 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.17 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| L1 cache | 16 KB | 2.9 MB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB | 48 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Number of transistors | 286 million | 57000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon MP 3.16 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 604 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon MP 3.16 and Apple M1 Max. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 10 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 135 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Xeon MP 3.16 has 1425.9% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Max, on the other hand, has 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon MP 3.16 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon MP 3.16 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon MP 3.16 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
