Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon L5609

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5609
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 40 Watt
2.13
Ryzen 5 3500U
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
4.49
+111%

Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon L5609 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17901261
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$2360 $672

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size239 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FP5
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2DDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size288 GB64 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5609 2.13
Ryzen 5 3500U 4.49
+111%

Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon L5609 by 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon L5609 3298
Ryzen 5 3500U 6952
+111%

Ryzen 5 3500U outperforms Xeon L5609 by 111% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 4.49
Recency 16 March 2010 6 January 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 5 3500U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5609 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5609 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 3500U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5609 and Ryzen 5 3500U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5609
Xeon L5609
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
Ryzen 5 3500U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8408 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5609 or Ryzen 5 3500U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.