Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Xeon L5609

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5609
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 40 Watt
2.13
+228%

Xeon L5609 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17902649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.045.17
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Conroe (2006−2007)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)July 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price$2666 $61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E6750 has 12825% better value for money than Xeon L5609.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.86 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz2.67 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million291 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5609 2.13
+228%
Core 2 Duo E6750 0.65

Xeon L5609 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon L5609 3298
+226%
Core 2 Duo E6750 1013

Xeon L5609 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by 226% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.13 0.65
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon L5609 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5609 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E6750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5609 and Core 2 Duo E6750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5609
Xeon L5609
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Core 2 Duo E6750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon L5609 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 201 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5609 or Core 2 Duo E6750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.