Atom N470 vs Xeon L5518
Primary details
Comparing Xeon L5518 and Atom N470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3317 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Pineview (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 March 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $75 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon L5518 and Atom N470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.133 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.83 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 123 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon L5518 and Atom N470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | 1366 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 6.5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5518 and Atom N470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon L5518 and Atom N470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5518 and Atom N470 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5518 and Atom N470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | Intel GMA 3150 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5518 and Atom N470.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 1 March 2010 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 6 Watt |
Xeon L5518 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
Atom N470, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon L5518 and Atom N470. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon L5518 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N470 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5518 and Atom N470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
