i5-560M vs Xeon L5410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008
50 Watt
1.27
+1.6%

Xeon L5410 outperforms Core i5-560M by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22932314
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i5
Power efficiency2.313.25
Architecture codenameno dataArrandale (2010−2011)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)26 September 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.33 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rateno data1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data20
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81+114 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °C105 °C
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA771BGA1288,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-+
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data766 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5410 1.27
+1.6%
i5-560M 1.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5410 1940
+1.9%
i5-560M 1903

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 1.25
Recency 1 January 2008 26 September 2010
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon L5410 has a 1.6% higher aggregate performance score.

i5-560M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M.

Be aware that Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-560M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5410 and Core i5-560M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
Intel Core i5-560M
Core i5-560M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 64 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 484 votes

Rate Core i5-560M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5410 or Core i5-560M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.