A6-5400K vs Xeon L5410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.15
+45.6%
A6-5400K
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.79

Xeon L5410 outperforms A6-5400K by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25452789
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.890.47
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameHarpertown (2007−2008)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date25 March 2008 (17 years ago)2 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$320no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.33 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (per die)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size2x 107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °C70 °C
Number of transistors820 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketLGA771FM2
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/ARadeon HD 7540D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon L5410 1.15
+45.6%
A6-5400K 0.79

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon L5410 1853
+45.2%
A6-5400K 1276

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 0.79
Recency 25 March 2008 2 October 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon L5410 has a 45.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 30% lower power consumption.

A6-5400K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon L5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-5400K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation processor while A6-5400K is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 68 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 180 votes

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.