A6-5400K vs Xeon L5410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5410
2008
50 Watt
1.24
+51.2%

Xeon L5410 outperforms A6-5400K by an impressive 51% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22142488
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.240.02
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataTrinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)2 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Current price$76 $163

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon L5410 has 1100% better value for money than A6-5400K.

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.33 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data246 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FM2
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 7540D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5410 1.24
+51.2%
A6-5400K 0.82

Xeon L5410 outperforms A6-5400K by 51% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon L5410 1921
+52.2%
A6-5400K 1262

Xeon L5410 outperforms A6-5400K by 52% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 0.82
Recency 1 January 2008 2 October 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon L5410 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-5400K in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon L5410 is a server/workstation processor while A6-5400K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5410 and A6-5400K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5410
Xeon L5410
AMD A6-5400K
A6-5400K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 64 votes

Rate Xeon L5410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 159 votes

Rate A6-5400K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5410 or A6-5400K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.