Opteron 3320 EE vs Xeon L5335

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon L5335
2007
4 cores / 4 threads, 50 Watt
1.09
Opteron 3320 EE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.21
+11%

Opteron 3320 EE outperforms Xeon L5335 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24002327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency2.064.58
Architecture codenameClovertown (2006−2007)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date13 August 2007 (17 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$380no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache4 MB (per die)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB L2 Cache8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size2x 143 mm2315 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)60 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA771AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboardDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon L5335 1.09
Opteron 3320 EE 1.21
+11%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon L5335 1737
Opteron 3320 EE 1918
+10.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.09 1.21
Recency 13 August 2007 4 December 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Opteron 3320 EE has a 11% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Opteron 3320 EE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon L5335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon L5335 and Opteron 3320 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon L5335
Xeon L5335
AMD Opteron  3320 EE
Opteron 3320 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 3 votes

Rate Xeon L5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3320 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon L5335 or Opteron 3320 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.