EPYC 4464P vs Xeon Gold 6423N

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6423N
2023
28 cores / 56 threads, 195 Watt
37.53
+18.4%

Xeon Gold 6423N outperforms EPYC 4464P by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking96133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.92
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency17.5527.53
Architecture codenameno dataRaphael (2023−2024)
Release date1 July 2023 (1 year ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads5624
Base clock speed2 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache52.5 MB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data61 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFCLGA4677AM5
Power consumption (TDP)195 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4400DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes6428

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6423N 37.53
+18.4%
EPYC 4464P 31.70

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6423N 57434
+18.4%
EPYC 4464P 48518

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.53 31.70
Recency 1 July 2023 21 May 2024
Physical cores 28 12
Threads 56 24
Power consumption (TDP) 195 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon Gold 6423N has a 18.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

EPYC 4464P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 months, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6423N is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 4464P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6423N and EPYC 4464P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6423N
Xeon Gold 6423N
AMD EPYC 4464P
EPYC 4464P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6423N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate EPYC 4464P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6423N or EPYC 4464P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.