Pentium 6805 vs Xeon Gold 6342

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6342
2021
24 cores / 48 threads, 230 Watt
30.59
+970%

Xeon Gold 6342 outperforms Pentium 6805 by a whopping 970% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1221594
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.72no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)no data
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$4256 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)no data
Threads484
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache36 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography10 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature81 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)81 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCBGA1526
Power consumption (TDP)230 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
SIPPno data-
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733
Maximum memory size6 TB64 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805.

PCIe version4.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6342 30.59
+970%
Pentium 6805 2.86

Xeon Gold 6342 outperforms Pentium 6805 by 970% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6342 47320
+970%
Pentium 6805 4424

Xeon Gold 6342 outperforms Pentium 6805 by 970% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.59 2.86
Recency 6 April 2021 1 October 2020
Threads 48 4
Power consumption (TDP) 230 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6342 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 6805 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6342 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 6805 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6342 and Pentium 6805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6342
Xeon Gold 6342
Intel Pentium 6805
Pentium 6805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6342 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 188 votes

Rate Pentium 6805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6342 or Pentium 6805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.