Xeon D-2796NT vs Gold 6338N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 182 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 13.56 | no data |
Architecture codename | Ice Lake-SP (2021) | no data |
Release date | 6 April 2021 (3 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) | 20 (Icosa-Core) |
Threads | 64 | 40 |
Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 48 MB (shared) | 30 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 83 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA4189 | FCBGA2579 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | no data | + |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | - |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
SGX | Yes with Intel® SPS | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2667 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 6 TB | 1 TB |
Max memory channels | 8 | 4 |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 64 | 32 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 6 April 2021 | 1 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 32 | 20 |
Threads | 64 | 40 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 185 Watt | 120 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6338N has 60% more physical cores and 60% more threads.
Xeon D-2796NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 54.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6338N and Xeon D-2796NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.