EPYC 7513 vs Xeon Gold 6254

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6254
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 200 Watt
19.64
EPYC 7513
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 200 Watt
38.33
+95.2%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Xeon Gold 6254 by an impressive 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26372
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.087.85
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,803$2,840
Current price$3780 (1x MSRP)$4189 (1.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7513 has 29% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6254.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3664
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.65 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.125 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache18 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache24.75 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature82 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6254 19.64
EPYC 7513 38.33
+95.2%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Xeon Gold 6254 by 95% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Gold 6254 30381
EPYC 7513 59285
+95.1%

EPYC 7513 outperforms Xeon Gold 6254 by 95% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.64 38.33
Recency 2 April 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 18 32
Threads 36 64
Cost $3803 $2840
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The EPYC 7513 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6254 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6254 and EPYC 7513, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6254
Xeon Gold 6254
AMD EPYC 7513
EPYC 7513

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6254 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate EPYC 7513 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6254 or EPYC 7513, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.