Xeon Gold 6250L vs Gold 6252N
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Series | Intel Xeon Gold | no data |
Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | no data |
Release date | 2 April 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 January 2020 (4 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $4,259 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 48 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 23 | no data |
L1 cache | 1.5 MB | no data |
L2 cache | 24 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 35.75 MB | 35.75 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | 60 °C |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | no data |
Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA3647 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 4.5 TB |
Max memory channels | 6 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 2 April 2019 | 1 January 2020 |
Physical cores | 24 | 8 |
Threads | 48 | 16 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 185 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6252N has 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and 23.3% lower power consumption.
Xeon Gold 6250L, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.
We couldn't decide between Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6252N and Xeon Gold 6250L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.