Xeon Silver 4116T vs Gold 6252

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6252
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
17.42
+78.9%
Xeon Silver 4116T
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
9.74

Xeon Gold 6252 outperforms Xeon Silver 4116T by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking371791
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.17no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon GoldIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency10.7910.64
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Skylake (server) (2017−2019)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)11 July 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,655no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4824
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2121
L1 cache1.5 MB768 KB
L2 cache24 MB12 MB
L3 cache35.75 MB16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C91 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1 TB768 GB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6252 17.42
+78.9%
Xeon Silver 4116T 9.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6252 27148
+78.8%
Xeon Silver 4116T 15187

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.42 9.74
Recency 2 April 2019 11 July 2017
Physical cores 24 12
Threads 48 24
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 85 Watt

Xeon Gold 6252 has a 78.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4116T, on the other hand, has 76.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6252 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4116T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6252 and Xeon Silver 4116T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6252
Xeon Gold 6252
Intel Xeon Silver 4116T
Xeon Silver 4116T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4116T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6252 or Xeon Silver 4116T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.