Ultra 5 228V vs Xeon Gold 6252

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Gold 6252
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 150 Watt
17.09
+36.2%
Core Ultra 5 228V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.55

Xeon Gold 6252 outperforms Core Ultra 5 228V by a substantial 36% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking378620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.01no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Goldno data
Power efficiency10.7869.86
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,655no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads488
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s37 MHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.5 MB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache35.75 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature86 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 130V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes484

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Gold 6252 17.09
+36.2%
Ultra 5 228V 12.55

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Gold 6252 27148
+36.2%
Ultra 5 228V 19930

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.09 12.55
Recency 2 April 2019 24 September 2024
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 17 Watt

Xeon Gold 6252 has a 36.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

Ultra 5 228V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 782.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Gold 6252 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 228V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Gold 6252 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 228V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Gold 6252 and Core Ultra 5 228V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Gold 6252
Xeon Gold 6252
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
Core Ultra 5 228V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 9 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 228V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Gold 6252 or Core Ultra 5 228V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.