Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon Gold 6140
Aggregate performance score
Xeon Gold 6140 outperforms Ryzen 5 2600 by an impressive 85% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 474 | 959 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 20 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.37 | 9.39 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon Gold | AMD Ryzen 5 |
| Power efficiency | 10.37 | 12.04 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) |
| Release date | 25 April 2017 (7 years ago) | 19 April 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,445 | $199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 5 2600 has 115% better value for money than Xeon Gold 6140.
Detailed specifications
Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 36 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 23 | 34 |
| L1 cache | 1.125 MB | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 18 MB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | 24.75 MB | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Die size | no data | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 91 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 (Multiprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 768 GB | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Gold 6140 and Ryzen 5 2600.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 15.24 | 8.22 |
| Recency | 25 April 2017 | 19 April 2018 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 6 |
| Threads | 36 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 140 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon Gold 6140 has a 85.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Ryzen 5 2600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 115.4% lower power consumption.
The Xeon Gold 6140 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon Gold 6140 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 2600 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
